<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>rmcrob / evolutiondiscussion</title>
    <description>Tweets from the collection Evolution discussion on tweetlibrary.com.</description>
    <link>http://tweetlibrary.com/rmcrob/evolutiondiscussion</link>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227462213789683713</link>
      <description>@rmcrob @joffrethegiant @wyclif But I agree that it is more willful than 'I was born this way'</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227462213789683713</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227462027260600320</link>
      <description>@rmcrob @joffrethegiant @wyclif we are still responsible for our actions, and Jesus is still the answer.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227462027260600320</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227461857865236481</link>
      <description>@rmcrob @joffrethegiant @wyclif broken psychology (whether from biological sickness or from environment) is still part of the sin sickness</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227461857865236481</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227460929741271040</link>
      <description>@joffrethegiant @CulturalSavage @wyclif I think I get that. Psych makes it seem like you are a victim. You can’t help it. Either might be.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227460929741271040</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>joffrethegiant</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/joffrethegiant/statuses/227459918146457601</link>
      <description>@CulturalSavage @rmcrob @wyclif Fuzzy distinction, I know.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/joffrethegiant/statuses/227459918146457601</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>joffrethegiant</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/joffrethegiant/statuses/227459828900065281</link>
      <description>@CulturalSavage @rmcrob @wyclif I'd prefer to keep need based on world view in the realm of logic and will, out of psychology. Keeps it sin.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/joffrethegiant/statuses/227459828900065281</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227459796343848961</link>
      <description>@joffrethegiant @CulturalSavage @rmcrob @wyclif ...which they are trying to defend in the first place. It's very insular.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227459796343848961</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227459632057167872</link>
      <description>@CulturalSavage @joffrethegiant @wyclif Sparks seemed to be pointing to a Cartesian mindset that cannot accept any uncertainties. B&amp;W only.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227459632057167872</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227459150056153088</link>
      <description>@joffrethegiant @rmcrob @wyclif I say compulsion as in a driving need based off of their world view</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227459150056153088</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227458852872937472</link>
      <description>@joffrethegiant @rmcrob @wyclif couple that with the inability to face a paradox, and yes.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227458852872937472</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>joffrethegiant</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/joffrethegiant/statuses/227458812100091905</link>
      <description>@joffrethegiant @CulturalSavage @rmcrob @wyclif "Compulsion" is a very powerful and very vague word...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/joffrethegiant/statuses/227458812100091905</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227458355822739457</link>
      <description>@rmcrob @joffrethegiant @wyclif @CulturalSavage I'm updating the conversation linked to as it continues.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227458355822739457</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>joffrethegiant</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/joffrethegiant/statuses/227458130542485505</link>
      <description>@CulturalSavage @rmcrob @wyclif Sounds like that could be shortened to "a need to have the world make sense according to their worldview."</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/joffrethegiant/statuses/227458130542485505</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227457803504205824</link>
      <description>@rmcrob @joffrethegiant @wyclif Right, not a mental disorder; a psychological need to have the world make sense according to their worldview</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227457803504205824</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227457174132117505</link>
      <description>@joffrethegiant @rmcrob @wyclif Rather, they will construct a persecution reality/complex based on your disagreements.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227457174132117505</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227457116821131264</link>
      <description>@joffrethegiant @wyclif @culturalsavage http://t.co/ukvuO3fL #Kindle</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227457116821131264</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227457030833721344</link>
      <description>@joffrethegiant @rmcrob @wyclif Since it's a compulsion, there is no logical arguments tat can change the fundy's view of reality.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227457030833721344</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227456985468112896</link>
      <description>@joffrethegiant @wyclif @culturalsavage http://t.co/Q9UtwNj2 #Kindle</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227456985468112896</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227456794228822017</link>
      <description>@joffrethegiant @rmcrob @wyclif If I remember, it's suggested that it's related to an obsessive compulsion, what they believe must be right</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227456794228822017</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227456777455808512</link>
      <description>@joffrethegiant @wyclif @culturalsavage http://t.co/fhZna4vf #Kindle</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227456777455808512</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227456386768986112</link>
      <description>@joffrethegiant @wyclif @culturalsavage http://t.co/rCB4ddbH #Kindle</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227456386768986112</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227455809884409856</link>
      <description>@joffrethegiant @rmcrob @wyclif Karen Armstrong touches on this (kind of) in 'Battle for God' some.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227455809884409856</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227454591724290048</link>
      <description>@joffrethegiant @wyclif @CulturalSavage It’s kind of a side note, but I think there was a reference. I’ll see if I can find it.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227454591724290048</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>joffrethegiant</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/joffrethegiant/statuses/227454135522447360</link>
      <description>@rmcrob @wyclif @culturalsavage I haven't read Sparks. What's gist of argument that fundyism is a psych disorder?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/joffrethegiant/statuses/227454135522447360</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227452943031492608</link>
      <description>This is when I love twitter. @wyclif @CulturalSavage @joffrethegiant  http://t.co/buhuPVgA</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227452943031492608</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227450080792301568</link>
      <description>@rmcrob @wyclif it is for sure. It's more about a worldview and framework for understanding than doctrinal beliefs.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227450080792301568</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227448515280896001</link>
      <description>@wyclif @CulturalSavage Finished reading “God’s Word in Human Words”. Sparks comments that fundyism might be a psych issue. Not Xtian only.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227448515280896001</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>wyclif</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227447670065737729</link>
      <description>@CulturalSavage @rmcrob That is true, as you can see by that link. It is tied into specific rejection of JEDP.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227447670065737729</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>wyclif</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227447401860968448</link>
      <description>@CulturalSavage @rmcrob Almost all the YEC people I can think of reject academia in some way. They don't think of YEC as anti-intellectual.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227447401860968448</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227446821922955265</link>
      <description>@rmcrob It's an argument about hermeneutics and epistemology, not scientific fact.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227446821922955265</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>wyclif</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227446481173504000</link>
      <description>@CulturalSavage @rmcrob That, too.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227446481173504000</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227446436319608835</link>
      <description>@rmcrob It's not an argument about science; it's about (in their mind) the believably/truth/unchanging-ness of the Christian faith</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227446436319608835</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>wyclif</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227446358221672449</link>
      <description>@rmcrob @CulturalSavage I think many of them don't, because they would say heliocentrism is no longer theoretical like evolution (Behe, &amp;c.)</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227446358221672449</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227446105363841024</link>
      <description>@rmcrob 1- probably not. Too many fundamentalists. 2- no, because Evolution is part of the 'liberal agenda".</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227446105363841024</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227445656237789184</link>
      <description>@CulturalSavage Will evolution one day be accepted in the same manner? Do YECers see the inconsistency?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227445656237789184</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227445439862018049</link>
      <description>@rmcrob @wyclif @CulturalSavage Pre-modernism science is accepted as fact, simply because 'it's te way it's always been"</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227445439862018049</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>wyclif</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227445313101787136</link>
      <description>@rmcrob @joffrethegiant Used often when discussing OT/NT legal and forensic issues...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227445313101787136</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227445281384448000</link>
      <description>@rmcrob @wyclif Simply put: Copernicus was widly accepted as proveable truth before the YEC became the 'model of truth'</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227445281384448000</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227445121354964994</link>
      <description>@joffrethegiant @wyclif Thanks for noticing. The word is a favorite of mine.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227445121354964994</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>joffrethegiant</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/joffrethegiant/statuses/227444947111010306</link>
      <description>@rmcrob @wyclif That was a really sweet use of the word "obviating".</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/joffrethegiant/statuses/227444947111010306</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227443940750675968</link>
      <description>@wyclif I know there are flat earthers out there, but I don’t actually know any unless they are stealthy about it.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227443940750675968</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>wyclif</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227443653965148160</link>
      <description>@rmcrob B.B. Warfield certainly thought so. I wish I could say that I knew that "no one" rejects heliocentrism (don't ask).</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227443653965148160</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227443614308003840</link>
      <description>@wyclif @CulturalSavage Read it quickly. Claims anything other than YEC is heresy. Why not the same for Copernicus?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227443614308003840</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227442935996772352</link>
      <description>@wyclif My point exactly. No one rejects heliocentrism. I see an inconsistency there. One can accept both evolution &amp; creation, though.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227442935996772352</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>wyclif</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227442924810551296</link>
      <description>@CulturalSavage @rmcrob Here's an example of the view I'm talking about: http://t.co/E9ZiP8LD</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227442924810551296</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227442384298983424</link>
      <description>@rmcrob @wyclif That being said, YECers tend to ignore that they except scientific models that were created *after* the cannon was closed</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227442384298983424</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227441995331801089</link>
      <description>@rmcrob Even in a "primitive" understanding, it's not enough to base a planetary model off of.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227441995331801089</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>wyclif</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227441996032262144</link>
      <description>@rmcrob For example, Reformed theologian James B. Jordan rejects evolution and affirms creationism, but does not reject heliocentrism.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227441996032262144</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CulturalSavage</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227441973903118337</link>
      <description>@rmcrob @wyclif Gen 1 paints God setting lights to govern the day, night, and seasons.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/CulturalSavage/statuses/227441973903118337</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227441752754237440</link>
      <description>@wyclif True. I’m not sure how that affects the argument.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227441752754237440</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>wyclif</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227441467872907264</link>
      <description>@rmcrob Also, there are many gradations on the "rejecting evolution" plane. Rejecting Darwin's theory, or rejecting extra-Biblical history?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227441467872907264</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227440993685889024</link>
      <description>@wyclif Because they wrote it down?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227440993685889024</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>wyclif</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227440882159333376</link>
      <description>@rmcrob How do we really know what was in the mind of the Biblical writers?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227440882159333376</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227439977624133632</link>
      <description>@wyclif Are they not both examples of scientific evidence obviating the simplistic prescientific picture in the mind of the biblical writer?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227439977624133632</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>wyclif</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227439470138503168</link>
      <description>@rmcrob Not that I have seen. I don't think those two things are mutual.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/wyclif/statuses/227439470138503168</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rmcrob</title>
      <link>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227439152784887809</link>
      <description>Do Christians who reject evolution based on Genesis 1 also reject a heliocentric solar system on the same basis?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://twitter.com/rmcrob/statuses/227439152784887809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
